Criteria and Working Methods
SECTION 1: OVERVIEW OF THE RESEARCH ASSESSMENT EXERCISE
1.1 The primary purpose of the 2001 RAE is to produce ratings of research quality (Appendix C) which will be used by the higher education funding bodies in determining the main grant for research to the institutions which they fund with effect from 2002-03. The RAE is conducted jointly by the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE), the Scottish Higher Education Funding Council (SHEFC), the Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (HEFCW) and the Department of Education for Northern Ireland (DENI).
1.2 The assessment process is based on a peer review and is not mechanistic. Panels will use their professional judgement to form a view about the overall quality of the research activity described in each submission in the round, taking into account all the evidence presented.
1.3 The other principles by which the RAE is governed are:
1.4 The exercise is managed by the RAE Team, based at HEFCE, on behalf of the four funding bodies. All UK HEIs receiving funding from these bodies are eligible to participate.
1.5 The same rating scale as in 1996 will be used. The definitions of the points have been amended, following consultation with a group of former panel Chairs, in order to give greater clarity (Annex C). As in previous exercises panels will be able to indicate research groups which are identified as having particular excellence in research above the overall rating for a submission. Submissions which contain no evidence of research will not be awarded a rating.
1.6 Institutions will be invited to make submissions containing information on staff in post on the census date, 31 March 2001, on publications and other forms of assessable output which they have produced during the assessment period, on research support staff and students, research income, and a textual commentary. The assessment period is 1 January 1994 to 31 December 2000 in the case of Arts and Humanities subjects (UoA 45 to 67 inclusive) and 1 January 1996 to 31 December 2000 in the case of the other subjects (UoAs 1 to 44 and 68). All information will be submitted by 30 April 2001.
1.7 The results of the assessment will be published in December 2001. These will show the rating awarded to each submission and the number and proportion of staff submitted for assessment in each case. In addition, in order to improve the arrangements for feedback from the exercise, the funding bodies will produce:
1.8 The reports and feedback will be available in early 2002.
1.9 The funding bodies will also publish on the Internet those parts of submissions that contain factual data and textual information about the research environment. This will include the names of selected staff and the listings of their research output. Personal and contractual details will be removed and data on research students and research income will be presented in aggregate. Institutions will be given an opportunity to indicate any staff who should be omitted from the published list for reasons of security.
1.10 Panel members have been appointed from the list of nominations of experienced and well-regarded members of the research community, including users of research. The inclusion of user representatives on appropriate panels is intended to enhance the assessment process by making available a user perspective and expertise in assessing the quality of research expressed in forms of output which may be less familiar to academic panel members. All members play a full and equal part in the assessment process and share responsibility for reaching and justifying the Panelís final decisions.
Last updated 4 June 1999